Users can access on-demand Mac servers for app development, Mac tasks, and enterprise builds. All of our plans and solutions are backed by genuine Mac hardware hosted in 8 professional data centers around the globe.12) Enterprise Architect: Enterprise Architect is a requirement management tool. It is one of the best requirements traceability tools that integrates seamlessly with other development tools by creating requirements in the model. Features: Allows to build robust and maintainable systems.2 Agenda 1 About agosense & agosense.symphony 2 About PTC & PTC Integrity 3 Overview: Requirements Interchange Format (RIF/ReqIF) 4 Practical Examples 4.1 Automated exchange between PTC Integrity & IBM Rational Doors 4.2 Demo Video 5 Questions & Answers Slide 23 1 About agosense & agosense.symphony As a provider of the integration and exchange platform agosense.symphony we have positioned ourselves in the field of Development Process Integration integrating heterogeneous ALM-environments in software and system development into a continuous process chain. As new tools and other APIs become available, Android Studio tells you with a pop-up, or you can check for updates by clicking Help > Check for Update.Manufacturers typically work with hundreds of first and second tier suppliers, and proper requirements management was essential to make sure that the suppliers built the right thing (and to figure out whom to blame, if they didn't). In Germany, the Automotive industry has been on the forefront of innovation for decades. Process optimization via profound consulting and innovative solution concepts.Requirements Management and Requirements Engineering are fairly well established. The range of available adapters for popular tools ensures a swift implementation. The agosense.symphony architecture ensures that integration scenarios can be adapted to suite individual needs as set by customer requirements Slide 34 Requirements Exchange based on ReqIF between PTC Integrity & any RM tool via agosense.symphony In co-operation with PTC 21 June About agosense & agosense.symphony From requirements management, test, change or defect management to version management and more Direct connection to customer or partner portals allows for automated data exchange across company boundaries Slide 4 unde B Integration of existing development and ALM tools into a continuous process chain Kunde A unde C The Platform Requirements Management Modeling & Simulation Project Management Task Management Change / Defect Management Test Management Integration platform agosense.
![]() ![]() Reqif Studio Mac Servers ForThis worked reasonably well for a long time. Problem & HistoryEver since people started developing things, they have been concerned with recording the requirements that describe the problem that has to be solved: the thing that has to be built. Eclipse Papyrus) and an ongoing evolution of the standard. Enterprise Architect by Sparx Systems), open source reference implementations (e.g. Some notable results of the standardization of UML are cheap tools (e.g. New tools appeared, but most importantly, organizations were willing to train their personnel in UML, as they were not afraid of vendor lock-in any more. Users could work with arbitrary attributes (i.e. When DOORS was introduced roughly 25 years ago, people liked that it could import documents from Microsoft Office in a way that would broadly keep their appearance intact, while enhancing it with features that were necessary for professional requirements management. Consequently, the first requirements tools felt more like text processors and were designed to mimic the paper-based artifacts.A prominent tool that quickly gained popularity especially in the automotive industry was DOORS, today the property of IBM. Using Excel with additional columns is doable, but Excel will struggle with visualizing all original content (e.g. Doing this using a PDF is hard to automate. Typically, the supplier needs to provide comments, requirement by requirement. This in turn resulted in more and more information being lost in an export.As an example, consider an OEM creating a requirement specification for a supplier. Lossy ExportsAs users discovered the power of DOORS and similar products, they started to use more and more of the advanced features. DOORS was using a central database for teamwork within organizations, but for collaboration with suppliers typically exports in formats like PDF or Word would be created. 3ds emulator macThird-party tool vendors developed solutions, and armies of consultants started to develop scripts for their customers that would provide custom-tailored solutions.This provided a welcome relief for OEMs and suppliers, as they had a solution for the time being. DOORS Exchange allowed the lossless exchange of requirements, but only if both parties used DOORS. Tool Vendors to the RescueAs customers were struggling to keep as much information as possible intact upon exchanging requirements, both the tool vendors and system integrators got busy filling this need in the market. In contrast, professional requirements tools typically have extensive support for both managing traceability and analyzing it.Considering that the automotive industry regularly exchanges tens of thousands of requirements, the problem quickly becomes apparent. With formats based on Word or Excel, a traceability to the requirements can be done only with hacks like using text labels, but this is error prone at best and does not scale well. Crucially, they also commissioned a prototypical implementation that was freely available to the members of the HIS. RIF is bornIn 2004, the HIS commissioned the creation of the Requirements Interchange Format (RIF). This was extensively discussed at the Herstellerinitiative Software (HIS), a trade association of the automotive industry. And as such, relying on a proprietary solution from a single vendor was problematic. Nevertheless, the OEMs in particular realized that the inclusion of the supplier in the requirements engineering process was not just a convenience, but had strategic importance. Also, the Eclipse Requirements Modeling Framework had just been published as an open source reference implementation of ReqIF. The name was changed to avoid conflict with the Rule Interchange Format, another OMG standard that was already abbreviated as RIF.The release coincided with ReConf, a big industry conference, where attendees were surprised by a large number of talks, and even more importantly, by pledges from many vendors to support ReqIF in the near future. This changed in 2011, when the standard was officially release by the OMG under the new name ReqIF. The author is not aware of the use of RIF in a production environment – however, there were pilot projects and experiments.To those not looking closely, RIF pretty much felt dead. A few tool vendors even included RIF support in their tools, but all too often these felt more like marketing stunts than industry-strength implementations. Also, by not changing the schema, tools do not distinguish between 1.0.1 and 1.1. This demonstrated that ReqIF had reached a high level of maturity. This version is schema-compatible with version 1.0.1, and merely consists of clarifications. Development of the standard continued under the OMG, which released ReqIF 1.1 in October 2013. Specifically, they helped to establish an implementor forum in 2011, which is still active. The ProSTEP supported the creation of the RIF standard since the early days, and was responsible for the hand-over of the standard to the OMG, amongst other things.The ProSTEP is still actively supporting the introduction of ReqIF. ProSTEP Implementor ForumThe ProSTEP iViP association is an international association that has committed itself to developing innovative approaches to solving problems and modern standards for product data management and virtual product creation. The forum also included a number of consulting firms, service providers and system integrators.Particularly exciting is that over the years more and more partners joined the forum. Likewise, the most prominent tool vendors were present as well, including IBM and PTC. Most importantly, the most prominent users of ReqIF were present, including BMW, Continental, Daimler and Volkswagen.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorEdwin ArchivesCategories |